Was ist los in Libyen? Ursachen, Wirkung und Entwicklung / Sammelstrang

[tosh]

16.26 Uhr: Gaddafi-Truppen sollen Gefangene getötet haben


Amnesty International berichtet von einer weiteren grausamen Szene in Libyen: Anhänger des bisherigen Machthabers Muammar al-Gaddafi hätten womöglich mehr als 100 Gefangene in Militärcamps getötet. Augenzeugen hätten von brutalen Szenen berichtet, die sich am Dienstag und Mittwoch in zwei Lagern nahe Tripolis abgespielt haben sollen, teilt die Menschenrechtsorganisation mit. Die Gaddafi-treuen Truppen hätten Granaten geworfen und mit Schusswaffen auf die Gefangenen gefeuert.

Wenn die Meldung (Quelle ?) stimmt:
Gefange in Militärcamps getötet? Macht doch mehr Sinn, gefangene Militärs gleich vor Ort und Stelle zu exekutieren. ...

Denkbar ist, dass sie als sie noch erfolgreich waren, Gefangene machten - diese aber töteten, als sie ihre Niederlage vor Augen hatten.

[Quo vadis]

Hat er aber nicht.

Schon klar, alle auf der Welt, außer du, erleben in Liyben gerade eine Fatamorgana.

[tosh]

Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity

Und in jedem Krieg stirbt zuerst die Wahrheit.

[Steiner]

Es ist schon ein Armutszeugnis unserer Medien, dass man um einigermaßen gute Artikel über Libyen zu lesen auf ehemalige Sowjetblätter wie die Pravda zurückgreifen muss....

Resolutions 1970 and 1973 (2011) of the UN Security Council were very clear in their terms: No foreign military personnel, no mercenaries, no weapons to the parties in conflict and inspection of vessels ferrying arms and soldiers. NATO has breached all four counts and now is liable for prosecution under international law.

Resolutions 1970 and 1973 (2011) of the UN Security Council stated very clearly and categorically that there were to be no foreign troops on the ground in Libya, there were to be no mercenaries, neither were foreign powers to arm the parties to the conflict, as well as imposing the obligation on parties surrounding this to investigate vessels shipping in personnel or arms. NATO has not only failed on all four counts, it has categorically breached them all. NATO is guilty of breaching international law, and there will be consequences.

Quite apart from its obvious breaches of international law, NATO is liable for war crimes - strafing civilian structures such as the water supply system, to "break the population", strafing civilian structures with military hardware, murdering civilians in their homes by precision-bombing children, strafing civilians using Apache helicopters from the USA (isn't there a law in the US about that?).

-----------

The world is at a crossroads. Today, August 2011, we are facing a monumental battle between the forces of evil against an innocent man and an innocent and heroic population. The world is watching Goliath trying to devour David, who fights back heroically against NATO and its Satanic forces of evil who are racists, who have decapitated people in the streets, murdered children (like NATO) raped women and looted.

There is fresh evidence that foreign mercenaries are being deployed by NATO - British, French, Qatari and UAE military personnel have been captured; the Libyan Armed Forces allowed the British to come and collect their dead and wounded as they fled screaming, while the Royal Air Force would have strafed them.

And a clear sign that NATO represents evil is the sinister new practice of deleting facebook accounts of independent journalists, the alleged threats by CNN staff against numerous independent journalists in Tripoli (under investigation) and the media blackout from Libya. However it is not sufficient. We have other ways and means besides Facebook.

There are other social networks. We have other means besides channels like SKY, CNN, BBC and Al-Jazeera. There is an international movement to boycott them. There are also commercial consequences: a pan-African movement is being implemented to lock NATO countries out of Africa. You murdered Libyan kids? No place in Africa, no contract. Go steal your own resources, not ours.

----------

It is difficult to know what NATO wanted out of this. It was not peace, for they refused to negotiate. It was not democracy, for they refused to heed the call for elections. Could it then have been simply and only to steal a sovereign country's resources by murdering its people?

Now what, ladies and gentleman, will posterity say to that? Messrs. Cameron, Obama and Sarkozy, and that sickening clique of cowards in NATO, you are in deep, deep trouble. And by God, are you going to pay for what you have done...

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]

[Buella]

Und in jedem Krieg stirbt zuerst die Wahrheit.

Mit dem klitzekleinen Unterschied, daß dem Medienkonsumenten im Westen erzählt, wird, daß sog. Rebellen einen Befreiungskrieg für das libysche Volk führen, während tatsächlich WIR, in Form der NATO, des Westens, von diesem Westen hochgerüstete menschenverachtende Diktaturen, wie Katar und die VAE, und den sog. Rebellen, welche sich aus Al CIAda-Kombatanden und Ähnlichem zusammensetzen, dort einen barbarischen Krieg, also WIR, gegen das libysche Volk führen!

:O

[Buella]

Das gönne ich den Journalisten, jetzt sind sie nur ein abgelegter alter Schuh. Repessalien unter Gaddafi erfinden, echte Repressalien unter den Tali....ähm Rebellen erleiden, so ist´s fein.

Dieser Lügenbande wünsche ich, daß sie neben den, durch ihre Schmierereien und somit in Mittäterschaft und Anstiftung, ermordeten Opfern in den sommerlichen Straßen Libyens liegen und einen langen Weg zum gleißenden Licht benötigen, währenddessen sie noch sehr viel Zeit haben, über jede geschmierte Silbe ihres widerlichen Verrats, für Silberlinge, nachzudenken!

:O

[Steiner]

Auf Wiedersehen Gaddafi, Herzlich Willkommen Al Quaida?

[vaater]

Im Augenblick habe ich geschrieben ... stehe ich auf keiner Seite..

Servus umananda

Der Witz des Monats.

Du hast dich hier bei Politikforen.net ohne Scham als Zionistin bezeichnet.

Was ist nun, welche Aussage ist wahr?
Zionisten wechseln keine Seiten, die haben nur eines im Sinn, die NWO mit der Hauptstadt Jerusalem.

[vaater]

Hier sieht man den Unterschied zwischen einem echten Judenfreund ("true believer") und einer verschlagenen Zionistin.

Dem ist nichts hinzuzufügen.

[Steiner]

Ist Colonel Gaddafi möglicherweise in Zimbabwe untergetaucht? Es soll einige Hinweise darauf geben.

It's Official: Col Muammar Gaddafi Is In Zimbabwe

It official; Col Muammar Gaddafi is now a guest of Zimbabwean despot Robert Mugabe in Harare, but activists of the Movement for Democratic Change, the MDC Veterans Activists Association (VAA) have called on Zimbabweans to storm the house in the Gunhill suburb of Harare to effect a mass citizens' arrest.
In a statement today the VAA said Gaddafi staged a nocturnal entry into Zimbabwe aboard a Zimbabwe Air force jet that landed at Suri-Suri Airbase in Chegutu at 01:07am on Wednesday morning.
“He was quickly whisked to a sprawling mansion in Harare’s Gunhill suburb under the cover of darkness with members of MDC VAA in a secret pursuit.
“We kept a hawk’s eye on the house since Wednesday until this morning (Friday) and we don’t doubt even for a second that the fallen despot is now a ‘unique guest’ to Robert Mugabe.
"The house is encircled by uniformed army personnel of the Zimbabwe National Army and is swarming with plain clothes policemen and dreaded CIO operatives.”
They said all indications were confirming what they saw, including heavily armed female blonde body guards of Libyan origin patrolling around the house where the former despot is holed up.


They also have clear video footages to back our claims. The suspicious female imposters in military attire are patrolling the vicinity with fingers on the trigger.
There has been a hive of activities since the arrival of Gaddafi in the Gunhill house as luxurious government vehicles speed in and out of ‘brother leader’s new compound’.
All roads passing near the house were blocked since Wednesday morning, literally slapping the neighbor with a curfew.
MDC VAA National Chairman Solomon Sox Chikohwero said they were giving Gaddafi a week to leave Zimbabwe from today (Friday).

“This country is not a haven for dictators. We have two so far, who we cannot afford even for one day, and the third one is obviously an additional encumber to our burden.
“If he fails to do so we shall be storming t hat house in our thousands and effect a mass citizen arrest and hand him over to the ICC (International Criminal Court) in Hague.
“No sane Zimbabwe security personnel will arrest or shoot us in defense of a dejected and rejected dictator,” he said.

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]