Wenn der Kerl nur berechenbar wäre...Zitat:
Zitat von Steiner
Druckbare Version
Wenn der Kerl nur berechenbar wäre...Zitat:
Zitat von Steiner
Vollkommen Richtig.Zitat:
Zitat von Quo vadis
Ich persönlich hätte auch niemals gedacht, dass ich zur Wahrheitsfindung in diesem Konflikt auf ziemlich sozialistische Seiten wie die hier zurückgreifen muss:
http://libya360.wordpress.com/
http://mathaba.net/
Aber selbst diese Seiten berichten momentan wahrheitsgetreuer als es unsere Medien tun und ich bin wahrlich kein Sozialist wie du mit Sicherheit weisst.:]
Weils so schön die Blödheit von NATO und Islamisten auf einen Haufen zeigt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVd4pEDoPNk
War er doch in letzten Jahren. Er wollte sich definitiv dem Westen annähern.Zitat:
Zitat von Senator74
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar...oreign_affairsZitat:
Gaddafi's regime faced growing opposition from Islamic extremists during the 1990s, particularly the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which nearly assassinated him in 1996. Gaddafi began giving counter-terrorism intelligence to MI6 and the CIA in the 1990s, and issued the first arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden in 1998, after he was linked to the killing of German anti-terrorism agents in Libya.[142] He also offered to dismantle his active weapons of mass destruction program in 1999. In 2003, following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein by U.S. forces, Gaddafi again admitted to having an active weapons of mass destruction program, and was willing to dismantle it. In 2002, Saddam Hussein paid Gaddafi $3.5 billion to save him should he have an internal coup or war with America.[143] His announcement was well-publicized and during interviews, Gaddafi confessed that the Iraq War "may have influenced him", but he would rather "focus on the positive", and hoped that other nations would follow his example.[144] Gaddafi's commitment to the War against Terror attracted support from the United States and Britain. Prime minister Tony Blair publicly met with Gaddafi in 2004, commending him as a new ally in the War on Terror. During his visit, Blair lobbied for the Royal Dutch Shell oil company, which secured a deal in Libya worth $500 million.[145][146] The United States restored its diplomatic relations with Libya during the Bush administration, removing Libya from its list of nations supporting terrorism.[147] President George W. Bush and Dick Cheney portrayed Gaddafi's announcement as a direct consequence of the Iraq War. Hans Blix, then UN chief weapons inspector, speculated that Gaddafi feared being removed like Saddam Hussein: "I can only speculate, but I would imagine that Gadhafi could have been scared by what he saw happen in Iraq. While the Americans would have difficulty in doing the same in Iran and in North Korea as they have done in Iraq, Libya would be more exposed, so maybe he will have reasons to be worried."
Wie du weißt sind es ja selten die Feinde die einen umbringen, sondern ausgerechnet die Freunde. Das erlebst du gerade in Sachen "westl. Wertegemeinschaft", die alle Züge der NWO trägt. Schaffung einer Einmensch, Einnation "globalisierten Welt" ist ausdrücklich politischer Wille.Zitat:
Zitat von Steiner
Was für eine ekelhafte Bande.....Zitat:
Zitat von Quo vadis
Nato liefert dem Gesindel die Uniformen, das Gesindel trägt diese auch noch und dann übliches Allah Aukbar. Wenn es nicht so brutal traurig wäre, gerade in Anbetracht der 6000 toten Gi´s in Irak/Afghanistan und vielen anderen Natioanen dazu, ist es sogar komisch. Das sollten sich vor allem die BW Angehörigen ansehen- wie Al Kaida in nagelneuen US- Uniformen, Allah lobt.Zitat:
Zitat von Steiner
Da hast du leider Recht. Ich als Republikaner kann nur sagen, dass ich strikt gegen die NWO bin. Eine totalitäre Weltregierung verstößt gegen jegliches republikanische Prinzip der individuellen Selbstbestimmung.:]Zitat:
Zitat von Quo vadis
Eben, NWO ist zudem kollektivistisch sozialistisch, von der Subventionspolitik ganz zu schweigen.Zitat:
Zitat von Steiner
"Once NATO decides officially to start a ground operation in Libya it will turn the rebels and Muslim extremists that are now fighting Gaddafi against the troops that would invade Libya."
The NATO-led regime change in Libya might well turn the country into a failed state, following the example of Afghanistan.
Once Gaddafi leaves power, one way or another – because it is simply impossible for him to fight the whole of the NATO – the National Transitional Council (NTC) will have huge divisions within its own rank and it is highly doubtful it will be able to keep Libya as a united state.
The editor doubts the Gaddafi regime can survive, saying “the most he can try to negotiate is a safe exit for him and his family.”
“The problem of post-Gaddafi era could be actually more problematic than the problem before the removal of Gaddafi regime, because there is a huge split among the rebels themselves.”
“The majority of people who are fighting Gaddafi are Muslim extremists or people who believe they must create an Islamic state in Libya,” Abdel Bari Atwan acknowledged, saying that legitimizing this group would be a great problem for NATO.
Once NATO decides officially to start a ground operation in Libya it will turn the rebels and Muslim extremists that are now fighting Gaddafi against the troops that would invade Libya.
[ . . . ]
As for the UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s statement that NATO is going to stay in Libya as long as needed, that is a pure imperialism and the Libyan people will not tolerate this and will fight the aggressors, insists Abdel Bari Atwan.""
aus "Russia Today"
http://rt.com/news/atwan-libya-muslim-gaddafi-nato-029/