Impfschäden

[Rikimer]

Da war noch mehr nicht geplant. Es sollten ja die Ü60 weggeimpft werden, um die Rentenkassen zu entlasten. Man hat nicht mit der Gier der Pharma gerechnet, die dann sogar Kinder gespritzt haben.

Ich erinnere mich. Meine Eltern haben um diesen Zeitraum herum verdächtig viele Briefe vom deutschen Staat bekommen. Quasi freundlich nachfragend ob man noch am Leben sei. Ich fand das sehr interessant, das in dieser Häufigkeit...

[Rikimer]

DR. KEVIN CORBETT INTERVIEW | FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE? | ORACLE FILMS

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]

Scientist Dr. Kevin Corbett on the simulated virus called Covid

Mullis challenged the popular wisdom that the disease-causing mechanisms of HIV are simply too "mysterious" to comprehend. "The mystery of that damn virus," he said at the time, "has been generated by the $2 billion a year they spend on it. You take any other virus, and you spend $2 billion, and you can make up some great mysteries about it too."

"The novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has been spreading worldwide, resulting in growing numbers of infected individuals since late 2019 and increased mortality numbers since early 2020. So far, experts have seen that while there are severe cases, the infection is usually mild with non-specific symptoms. And there are no trademark clinical features of COVID-19 infection."

"Diagnosis of COVID-19 involves laboratory tests. Once someone has been diagnosed with the coronavirus, additional diagnostic tests may be done to determine the severity of the infection."

if they want to further increase the number of 'infected' people, they have to also increase the number of tests. However, that is physically impossible.

In the US, we have all but abandoned classical diagnostic medicine in favor of biotech, or lab result medicine. This has been going on for a long time and is a dangerous turning. The "Corona test" is named with characteristic tech-tedium: "CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel." That means it is

---

A PCR test.

It finds fragments, nucleic acids.

"PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. "

If things were done right, "infection" would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.

"You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it," Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me.

"You don't start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I'm skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It's a great scientific research tool. It's a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms...the dead cells are generating the symptoms."

"Don't do it, I say, when people ask me," he replies. "No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable."

it's a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive."

"It's like fingerprints. With PCR you're only looking at a small number of nucleotide. You're looking at a tiny segment of gene, like a fingerprint. When you have regular human fingerprints, they have to have points of confirmation. There are parts that are common to almost all fingerprints, and it's those generic parts in a Corona virus that the PCR test picks up. They can have partial loops but if you only took a few little samples of fingerprints you are going to come up with a lot of segments of RNA that we are not sure have anything to do with corona virus. They will still show up in PCR. You can get down to the levels where its biologically irrelevant and then amplify it a trillion-fold."

"The primers are what you know. We already know the strings of RNA for the Corona family, the regions that are stable. That's at one end. Then you look at the other end of the region, for all Corona viruses. The Chinese decided that there was a region in those stable areas that was unique to their Corona virus. You do PCR to see if that is true. If it is truly unique it would work. But they're using the SARS test because they don't really have one for the new virus."

Crowe described a case in the literature of a woman who had been in contact with a suspect case of Corona (in Wuhan) they believed was the index case.

"She was important to the supposed chain of infection because of this. They tested her 18 times, different parts of the body, like nose, throat — different PCR tests. 18 different tests. And she tested negative every time. And then they — because of her epidemiological connection with the other cases, they said: "We consider her infected. So, they had 18 negative tests and they said she was infected."

"I don't think they understand what they're doing," he said. "I think it's out of control. They don't know how to end this. This is what I think what happened: They have built a pandemic machine over many years and, and as you know, there was a pandemic exercise not long before this whole thing started."

"I just want to identify who sponsored that simulation conference, 6 weeks before the first news broke out of Wuhan," I interjected. "It was the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security, and the World Economic Forum. Incidentally, all the stats, projections and modeling you see in the media are coming out of Johns Hopkins."

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]


Why I Began Questioning HIV (From the House of Numbers Deluxe Edition DVD)

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]


Dr Kevin Corbett The Non Science Of Covid-19 +Laura Jayne Consciousness Arising Conference Liverpool

Dr Kevin P.Corbett - The Non-science of ‘Covid-19’ & Nazification of the British NHS, This talk discusses the non-proven existence of the so-called ‘novel Coronavirus’ (‘SARS-CoV-2’), specifically the fact that no virus has ever been purified (isolated) as the necessary prerequisite for the gold standard to evaluate the accuracy of the ‘Covid’ tests such as the RT-PCR, antibody and other point-of-care tests. The talk also shows how the 2020 radical restructuring of the NHS into a ‘Covid Health Service’ is dangerously commanding health professionals to impose sinister changes to their normal caring practices.

Es war von Anfang an klar das es ein gigantischer Betrug ist. Aber man kann von der Lüge nicht loslassen, sonst bricht das Kartenhaus des Betrugssystems noch schneller zusammen.

[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]

[Politikqualle]

Es war von Anfang an klar das es ein gigantischer Betrug ist. Aber man kann von der Lüge nicht loslassen, sonst bricht das Kartenhaus des Betrugssystems noch schneller zusammen.

.. puuhh .. du hast aber auch keine Angst vor dem Verfassungsschutz ..
..
.
*** Der so genannte Covid-19-Impfstoff von AstraZeneca, welcher laut Auskunft von Politik und Systemmedien "sicher", "geprüft", "wirksam" und "nebenwirkungsfrei" war, ist mit Datum vom 27. März 2024 in der Europäischen Union nicht mehr zugelassen. Der Antrag auf die Rücknahme der Marktzulassung wurde von AstraZeneca selbst gestellt und von der EU bestätigt. Sie finden das Originaldokument in diesem Artikel. ***
.
.
... [Links nur für registrierte Nutzer] ...