Druckbare Version
John McCain, der Dirigent des "arabischen Frühlings" und der Kalif
https://www.voltairenet.org/article185097.html
„Der Kalif“, ein CIA-Blockbuster zwischen Fiktion und Realität
https://www.voltairenet.org/article208242.html
Propaganda und Post-Wahrheit
https://www.voltairenet.org/article208246.html
PKK Rojava Project ist nichts anderes als die direkte und plumpe Kopie des Zionismus. Hier der Beweis!
Ich bin zunächst auf diesen Autor gestossen, der einen sehr interessanten und anhand Quellen sehr ausführlichen und lesenswerten Artikel verfasst hat. Da schreibt er unter anderem auch, dass die PKK Kurden in Nordsyrien schlichtweg direkt den Zionismus kopieren.
https://www.barakabooks.com/the-myth...stephen-gowans
Und nun schauen wir uns die andere Seite an ...Zitat:
The Myth of the Kurdish YPG’s Moral Excellence: Stephen Gowans
...
Tip of the US Spear
For Washington, the PKK offers a benefit additional to the Kurdish guerrilla group’s utility in advancing the US goal of weakening Syria by fracturing it, namely, the PKK can be pressed into service as a surrogate for the US Army, obviating the necessity of deploying tens of thousands of US troops to Syria, and thereby allowing the White House and Pentagon to side-step a number of legal, budgetary and public relations quandaries. “The situation underscores a critical challenge the Pentagon faces,” wrote The Wall Street Journal’s Paul Sonne; namely, “backing local forces…instead of putting American troops at the tip of the spear.” [24]
Having pledged support for Kurdish rule of northern Syria in return for the PKK becoming the tip of the US spear, the United States is “providing “small arms, ammunition and machine guns, and possibly some nonlethal assistance, such as light trucks, to the Kurdish forces.” [25]
The arms are “parceled out” in a so called “drop, op, and assess” approach. The shipments are “dropped, an operation [is] performed, and the U.S. [assesses] the success of that mission before providing more arms.” Said a US official, “We will be supplying them only with enough arms and ammo to accomplish each interim objective.” [26]
PKK foot soldiers are backed by “more than 750 U.S. Marines,” Army Rangers, and US, French and German Special Forces, “using helicopters, artillery and airstrikes,” the Western marionette-masters in Syria illegally, in contravention of international law. [27]
Ethnic Cleansing
“Large numbers of Arab residents populate the regions Kurds designate as their own.” [28] The PKK has taken “over a large swath of territory across northern Syria—including predominantly Arab cities and towns.” [29] Raqqa, and surrounding parts of the Euphrates Valley on which the PKK has set its sights, are mainly populated by Arabs, observes The Independent’s veteran foreign correspondent Patrick Cockburn—and the Arabs are opposed to Kurdish occupation. [30]
Kurdish forces are not only “retaking” Christian and Muslim Arab towns in Syria, but are doing the same in the Nineveh province of Iraq—areas “which were never Kurdish in the first place. Kurds now regard Qamishleh, and Hassakeh province in Syria as part of ‘Kurdistan’, although they represent a minority in many of these areas.” [31]
The PKK now controls 20,000 square miles of Syrian territory [32], or roughly 17 percent of the country, while Kurds represent less than eight percent of the population.
In their efforts to create a Kurdish region inside Syria, the PKK “has been accused of abuses by Arab civilians across northern Syria, including arbitrary arrests and displacing Arab populations in the name of rolling back Islamic State.” [33] The PKK “has expelled Arabs and ethnic Turkmen from large parts of northern Syria,” reports The Wall Street Journal. [34] The Journal additionally notes that human rights “groups have accused [Syrian and Iraqi Kurdish fighters] of preventing Arabs from returning to liberated areas.” [35]
Neither Syrian nor Democratic
The PKK dominates the Syrian Democratic Forces, a misnomer conferred upon a group of mainly Kurdish fighters by its US patron. The group is not Syrian, since many of its members are non-Syrians who identify as Kurds and who flooded over the border from Turkey to take advantage of the chaos produced by the Islamist insurgency in Syria to carve out an area of Kurdish control. Nor is the group particularly democratic, since it seeks to impose Kurdish rule on Arab populations. Robert Fisk dismisses the “Syrian Democratic Forces” as a “facade-name for large numbers of Kurds and a few Arab fighters.” [36]
...
An Astigmatic Analogy
Some find a parallel in the YPG’s alliance with the United States with Lenin accepting German aid to return from exile in Switzerland to Russia following the 1917 March Revolution. The analogy is inapt. Lenin was playing one imperialist power off against another. Syria is hardly an analogue of Imperial Russia, which, one hundred years ago, was locked in a struggle for markets, resources, and spheres of influence with contending empires. In contrast, Syria is and has always been a country partitioned, dominated, exploited and threatened by empires. It has been emancipated from colonialism, and is carrying on a struggle—now against the contrary efforts of the PKK—to resist its recolonization.
The PKK has struck a bargain with the United States to achieve its goal of establishing a Kurdish national state, but at the expense of Syria’s efforts to safeguard its independence from a decades-long US effort to deny it. The partition of Syria along ethno-sectarian lines, desired by the PKK, Washington and Tel Aviv alike, serves both US and Israeli goals of weakening a focus of opposition to the Zionist project and US domination of West Asia.
A more fitting analogy, equates the PKK in Syria to Labor Zionism, the dominant Zionist force in occupied Palestine until the late 1970s. Like Ocalan, early Zionism emphasized decentralized communes. The kibbutzim were utopian communities, whose roots lay in socialism. Like the PKK’s Syrian incarnation, Labor Zionism relied on sponsorship by imperialist powers, securing their patronage by offering to act as the tips of the imperialists’ spears in the Arab world. Zionists employed armed conquest of Arab territory, along with ethnic cleansing and denial of repatriation, to establish an ethnic state, anticipating the PKK’s extension by armed force of the domain of a Kurdish state into Arab majority territory in Syria, as well as Kurd fighters doing the same in Iraq. Anarchists and other leftists may have been inspired by Jewish collective agricultural communities in Palestine, but that hardly made the Zionist project progressive or emancipatory, since its progressive and emancipatory elements were negated by its regressive oppression and dispossession of the indigenous Arab population, and its collusion with Western imperialism against the Arab world.
Conclusion
Representing an ethnic community that comprises less than 10 percent of the Syrian population, the PKK, a Kurdish anarchist guerrilla group which operates in both Turkey and Syria, is using the United States, its Air Force, Marine Corps, Army Rangers and Special Forces troops, as a force multiplier in an effort to impose a partition of Syria in which the numerically insignificant Kurd population controls a significant part of Syria’s territory, including areas inhabited by Arabs in the majority and in which Kurds have never been in the majority. To accomplish its aims, the PKK has not only struck a deal with a despotic regime in Washington which seeks to recolonize the Arab world, but is relying on ethnic cleansing and denial of repatriation of Arabs from regions from which they’ve fled or have been driven to establish Kurdish control of northern Syria, tactics which parallel those used by Zionist forces in 1948 to create a Jewish state in Arab-majority Palestine.
...
WHY ROJAVA MATTERS FOR ISRAEL
https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Why-Ro...-Israel-580358
"Israel is our only friend in the Middle East"
https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/c...nd-middle-east
Und nun wird es wirklich sehr interessant, hier aus von einer kurdischen PKK-Unterstützerin namens Dilar Dirik:
https://www.progressiveisrael.org/sy...aeli-socialism
In dem obigen Artikel geben PKK-Anhänger selbst zu, dass mit dem Rojava Project schlichtweg den Zionismus und deren Methoden kopieren.Zitat:
...
Syrian Kurds’ Anarcho-Feminism resembles early Israeli socialism
...
What Dirik described as happening on the ground in the autonomous Kurdish enclaves in northern Syria, with women’s empowerment, cooperative enterprises and decisions made via community-wide voting, reminded me of Israeli kibbutzim, moshavim and worker-owned cooperatives — especially during the most experimental times in the pre-State Yishuv. Israeli socialism was closer to anarcho-syndicalism than state socialism, but David Ben-Gurion was very much a “statist,” perhaps out of necessity, and Israel has developed very differently than the “one big kibbutz” or confederation of autonomous communities as envisioned by some early left-Zionist theorists. Today, most kibbutzim and moshavim are pleasant communities that have been basically absorbed into a corporate economic culture, with mere remnants remaining of their original collectivist ethos.
...
Sehr interessant.
https://jewishcurrents.org/fighting-for-rojava
...
Die PKK-Kurden kamen also von überall her, Turkey, Iran, Irak. Und sie identifizieren sich mit dem Zionismus, wenden ihre Methoden an.Zitat:
MM: Do you think it made sense to the Kurdish people that you were there?
TV: Oh hell yes. There were a lot of people that were native to Kobani and it was a matter of: “This is where we live, and we don’t have a choice but to fight.” But thousands and thousands of Kurds came from areas that weren’t Syria—from Turkey, Iran, Iraq.
...
MM: I’ve heard that the Kurds feel positively about Zionism or identify with it in a way. Did you ever get a sense of that?
TV: That never came up, but I know that there’s sort of a mutual affinity between Israelis and Kurds.
Zitat:
Zitat von Durkheim
Du bist ein türkischer Nazi der was gegen kurden ht. Falsch kurden leisten 40 Prozent die dummen Türken. 2 Prozent dumm dümmer türke
Zusammengefasst: Wer nix wurde, wurde Kurde.Zitat:
Zitat von Xilis
Wer nix Kurde, wurde wurde :D
Ich kann mich immer noch nicht entscheiden, welche Seite dieser fremdvölkischen Auseinandersetzung auf deutschem Boden jetzt meine Sympathien hat.Zitat:
Zitat von Lord Laiken
Generell tendiere ich aber zu Türken, da diese wohl irgendwie zivilisierter wirken, als Kurden. Jedenfalls habe ich mal so eine Steinigung eines Mädchens in einem Kurdengebiet als Video gesehen, kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass Türken das machen.
Es hieß ja auch schon bei Karl May "Durch das wilde Kurdistan".
---
Das würde ich gar nicht so sehr verallgemeinern. Gibt Solche und Solche. Ist so wie Bayern gegen Preußen, am Ende gehören sie doch zusammen und sind ein Volk. Würden irgendwelche Amis auf die Unabhängigkeit einer deutschen Bevölkerungsgruppe pochen, dann hätten wir hier bald einen ähnlichen Konflikt.Zitat:
Zitat von Klopperhorst
Wer islamistischer ist, vermag ich nicht zu sagen. Die Türkei ist nicht gerade auf Westkurs, Kopftuchbverbote an Schulen wurden abgeschafft und durch "Aufdonnerverbote" ersetzt. Bei den Kurden haben hingegen oft Frauen das Sagen, wieviel davon Show für den Westen ist, weiß ich natürlich auch nicht.
für <Durkheim sind ja Kurden nur Bergtürken somit stellt sich die Unterscheidung wahrscheinlich gar nicht :DZitat:
Zitat von Klopperhorst
Das Buch von Karl May "Durch das wilde Kurdistan" fand ich sehr interessant.Zitat:
Zitat von Klopperhorst
Von der Terror-Türkei ist mir bestens bekannt dass sie Christen diskriminieren, die Türkei gehört auf keinen Fall in die EU.