Die meisten Leute in diesen Videos waren zuvor auch "Impfgläubige"...Zitat:
Zitat von Rikimer
Druckbare Version
Die meisten Leute in diesen Videos waren zuvor auch "Impfgläubige"...Zitat:
Zitat von Rikimer
Wenn Wissenschaftler eine Meinung haben, sollte man sie unverzüglich vom Arbeitsplatz entfernen.Zitat:
Zitat von melamarcia75
Das wird von den Gläubigen der PCR-Tests ignoriert. Wer gibt schon zu das sein Ritual sich regelmäßig PCR-Tests unterzogen zu haben, einen Maulkorb übers Gesicht gezogen hat um seine ungesunden Abgase und Mikroben wieder zurück zu atmen, alle Lügen kollektiv geglaubt zu haben, umsonst waren? Wer macht das schon? Der einfachere Weg ist es dies zu verleugnen.Zitat:
Zitat von Le Bon
Der Erfinder des PCR-Tests Dr. Kary Mullis sagt das der PCR-Test nicht dazu entwickelt worden ist, um festzustellen zu können ob jemand gesund oder krank ist. Es ist nur dazu da, um aus etwas wenigem viel zu machen.
Inventor of COVID test calls Fauci a liar, says it ‘doesn’t tell you that you’re sick’Zitat:
"With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody."
"Because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body. So that could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it’s meaningful."
"It allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it …like it is important … see that’s just a misinterpretation,"
He described PCR testing as "a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with
As Mullis noted himself, the ICSLS observed that PCR tests are unable to distinguish between "the whole virus and viral fragments," meaning that a so-called positive test, as mentioned in the CD paper, cannot determine if one is infected with the virus, but "merely indicates the presence of viral RNA molecules."
Once again, as Mullis had mentioned, the group said that PCR tests can be amplified to a level which renders the results "completely unreliable," and echoed Mullis’s very words — "amplified PCR products can be anything."
https://totalityofevidence.com/dr-kary-mullis/
Zur Erinnerung: der tansanianische Präsident John Magufuli hat der Weltöffentlichkeit 2020 den Schwachsinn mit den PCR - Tests gezeigt:
Faulty coronavirus tests: Goat, quail and papaya in Tanzania test positive for COVID-19, raising concerns about false positives
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTU5HXyd9gEZitat:
“We took samples from goats, we took samples from sheeps, we took samples from pawpaws, we even took samples from car oil, and we took samples from other different things, and we took the samples to the laboratory without them knowing and we even named all the samples.
Like the sample from the car oil we named it Jabil Hamza, 30 years old, Male, the result came back negative.
When we took the sample from a Jack fruit (Durian) we named it Sarah Samuel, 45 years old, Female, the result came back inconclusive.
When we took the samples from Pawpaw we named it Elizabeth Ana, 26 years old, Female the result came back positive, that it has Corona.
That means the liquid from the Pawpaw is positive.
We took samples from (a Bird type) called Kware the result came back positive.
We took samples from a rabbit the result came back indeterminate.
We took samples from a goat the results came back positive.
We took samples from a sheep and it came back negative, and so on and so on, so now when we see this you have to take samples and say that they are human’s and the results come back positive, that they have corona that means all the pawpaws should be in isolation, also and when they take the goat samples and they are also positive that means all the goats that we have here by assumption, or maybe the goat with the sample which was taken should also should be in isolation.”
PRESIDENT MAGUFULI OF TANZANIA EXPOSE COVID19 TEST KITS FOR BEING FAULTY, AND INACCURATE! WATCH WHY
2020 war damit schon klar das es sich um eine Scamdemie, Plandemie handelt.
Impfgläubige in diesem Forum werden es sich nicht ansehen.Zitat:
Zitat von Lykurg
Musst du nicht. Aber ein Blick ins PF-EU hilft vielleicht weiter... :-) Ansonsten geht es hier nicht um Glaubensfragen. sondern um die Folgen der Impfung mit Milliarden von Überlebenden.Zitat:
Zitat von Silencer
Weil Laien die keine Ahnung von der Materie haben das fordern?Zitat:
Zitat von MABF
Ein Studium der Medizin, der Biotechnologie oder der Biologie würde reichen um das zu schnallen
Lies mal hier:Zitat:
Zitat von Le Bon
https://telegra.ph/Corona-Die-nachvo...uptungen-10-15
Dann fang mal eines an, damit Du mitreden kannst.Zitat:
Zitat von melamarcia75
Deine Meinung interessiert in der Wissenschaft nicht.
Wo finde ich eine Studie die die Übersterblichkeit und die höhere Zahl an schwereren Verläufen bei Ungeimpften belegt?Zitat:
Zitat von melamarcia75
In seinem Puppenhaus.Zitat:
Zitat von Lichtblau
Ansonsten findest Du nur eine leicht erhöhte Sterblichkeit mit Beginn der Impfung.